For pet aftercare business owners, choosing between Aquamation and traditional flame cremation is not just a matter of preference—it’s a strategic decision involving long-term business models, operations, environmental impact, and customer perception.
As a professional Pet Aquamation machine manufacturer, we’ve seen a growing shift worldwide: more operators and customers are moving away from fire-based cremation and embracing alkaline hydrolysis. This article provides an honest side-by-side comparison, along with an educational and branding template you can use to educate your customers and build market trust.
Aspect
Pet Aquamation
Flame Cremation
Operational Cost
Low energy, minimal chemical use
High gas use, costly burner maintenance
Emissions & Pollution
Nearly zero emissions, very eco-friendly
Produces CO₂, smoke, and odor
Global Regulation
Approved in 20+ developed countries
Facing tighter restrictions in urban areas
Processing Time
6–20 hours depending on machine & pet size
1–3 hours
Ash Quality
Clean, white, sterile remains
Carbon-mixed ashes
Brand Image
Innovative, ethical, modern
Traditional, slowly becoming outdated
Urban families and younger customers are increasingly eco-conscious.
As gas prices increase, Aquamation remains more cost-efficient over time.
With no smoke or odor, it’s easier to get permits in cities like Bangkok and Hanoi.
Aquamation offers media-worthy uniqueness and aligns with modern brand values.
Here’s what you can prepare to educate your market:
WhatsApp us